Trade Mark Opposition


What is a Trade Mark Opposition?


Why have I been opposed?

There are many reasons why a party may oppose a Trade Mark application. There may be an issue concerning ownership of the name between yourself and someone you know. Larger corporations also frequently monitor and oppose Trade Marks containing key terms or features to prevent dilution of their brands. Often, oppositions can be filed strategically as leverage to deal with issues which would normally be dealt with at a Federal Court level but without the expense of a court proceeding.

Contact Us

How long does a Trade Mark opposition take?

Typically, it takes about 1 year for the evidence stages to be completed after which the parties can request for a hearing date to be set. The parties can however agree to a cooling off period for the purposes of negotiation which freezes the time frame temporarily.

Contact Us

What are the Stages of an Opposition?

Step 1

Notice of Intention to Oppose:

Step 2

Statement of Grounds and Particulars:

This is a summary document outlining the grounds of opposition which the Opponent intends to argue and must be filed within 1 month of the Notice of Intention to Oppose. Failure to meet that deadline may result in the opposition being abandoned.

Step 3

Notice of Intention to Defend:

This document must be filed by the Trade Mark owner if they wish to defend the opposition, within 1 month of receipt of the Statement of Grounds and Particulars. It’s worth noting that it may take several weeks for IP Australia to process and transmit the Statement of Grounds and Particulars to the Applicant, as the document needs to be checked for compliance with their minimum filing requirements. Failure to do lodge the Statement on time may mean that the Trade Mark is automatically removed from the Register and the opposition will succeed by default.

Step 4

Filing of Evidence in Support:

Step 5

Filing of Evidence in Answer:

This is a summary document outlining the grounds of opposition which the Opponent intends to argue and must be filed within 1 month of the Notice of Intention to Oppose. Failure to meet that deadline may result in the opposition being abandoned.

Step 6

Filing of Evidence in Reply:

This is a further opportunity for the Opponent to address any new material raised by the Evidence in Answer and must be filed within 2 months of the receipt of the Evidence in Answer. It is important that this evidence does not go beyond responding to the Evidence in Answer or introduce new material otherwise it may be objected to at the hearing.


How is the Opposition Decided?

Elect to go to Hearing:

Once the evidence stages have concluded, it is up to either the Opponent or the Applicant to request a Hearing of the Opposition. If no hearing is requested, there will be no decision made until either party has asked for a determination and paid the appropriate fee (depending on whether the parties do or do not wish to appear in person or by telephone/video link.

Each party has the choice to:

not attend the hearing;

file written submissions (legal arguments) only;

present their case in person or through their lawyers by video or telephone link.

A written decision will usually be issued within a few months of the hearing.


If either party is dissatisfied with the decision made, it is possible to file an appeal with the Federal Court or Federal Circuit Court of Australia. In those instances, the matter will be decided afresh and may incorporate new evidence not previously considered.


What outcomes can I expect from a Trade Mark opposition?

Since opposition is an administrative process, the eventual outcome of a Trade Mark opposition will be either that your Trade Mark is registered or refused. The Hearing Officer does not have the power to order injunctive relief to prevent a party from using a Trade Mark or to order damages.

The successful party may be awarded costs, however these are capped and unlikely to exceed around $6,000. Either party can appeal a Hearing Office decision to the Federal Court within a limited time frame of the decision being handed down.

In that case, the appeal is heard de novo (ie. from scratch) and can include new or different evidence to what was submitted originally.

Contact Us

What does an opponent need to prove?

There are 11 primary grounds which an opponent can rely upon in establishing an opposition. These include the same grounds which the Examiner will have considered in assessing the application for acceptance in addition to other grounds which are specific to oppositions. Some of the more common grounds include:

Deceptive Similarity With Prior Marks (Section 44):

Essentially, this ground alleges that the Examiner has made an error in their assessment of registrability and that there are substantially identical or deceptively similar marks which should have been raised in examination. Those marks usually belong to the Opponent but can also belong to third parties. This objection relies primarily on legal submissions, however evidence relating to honest concurrent use or prior continuous use of the mark by the Trade Mark applicant will also be relevant.

Reputational Grounds (Section 60/ Section 42(B):

This ground is similar to section 44 but relies on the Opponent’s ability to establish that it has an existing reputation in their Trade Mark rather than their registered rights. Therefore this ground relies heavily on evidence in support of the Opponent’s marketing activities and recognition of their brands.

Applicant Not The Owner Of The Trade Mark (Section 58):

Because Trade Mark rights are established based on first use rather than first to file, an Opponent can be the common lawyer owner of a Trade Mark even if they have not applied for or obtained a registered Trade Mark. However, to establish this ground, the Trade Mark used must be very close, if not identical, to the Trade Mark being opposed.

Bad Faith (Section 62A):


Other grounds of opposition include:


Where A Trade Mark Is Not Capable Of Distinguishing The Applicant’s Goods Or Services (Ie. It Is Too Descriptive);


The Trade Mark Is Scandalous (Eg. It Contains Offensive Terms);


The Trade Mark Is Likely To Deceive Or Cause Confusion (Eg. If The Trade Mark Itself Contains A False Claim About The Goods Or Services);


D. If A Trade Mark Has Been Accepted Based On Evidence Of Prior Use, The Opponent Can Show It Has Even Earlier Use;


The Applicant Is Not Intending To Use The Mark;


The Trade Mark Contains A False Geographical Indication.

Call Experienced IP Lawyers in Melbourne

Contact Us

To discuss your needs with a qualified intellectual property lawyer, book a meeting today. Our experienced IP lawyer in Melbourne can quickly get to the heart of your issue. We can provide you with the information, guidance and options you need to make an informed decision before you choose to engage us.

03 8371 0012

5 Everage Street, Moonee Ponds
Melbourne, VIC 3039

Schedule a Consultation!
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
YIP Legal  is a Melbourne-based specialist intellectual property law firm specialising in registration, protection and enforcement of Trade Marks, Designs, Copyright, Domain name disputes, Consumer law and IP dispute resolution.
5 Everage Street, Moonee Ponds Melbourne, VIC 3039